Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-29 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6P has a general score of 80.3, which is just a bit better than the TCL 10 5G UW's overall score of 73.5. Google Nexus 6P's design is lighter and notably thinner than TCL 10 5G UW, even though it was released many years before. The TCL 10 5G UW counts with a bit more powerful processor than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same number of cores, the TCL 10 5G UW also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Google Nexus 6P counts with a little bit better looking display than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. The TCL 10 5G UW shoots better photographs and videos than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the TCL 10 5G UW also has a back camera with way more mega-pixels and a bigger aperture to capture better images in low-light environments.
The TCL 10 5G UW features a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the TCL 10 5G UW also has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 256 GB. The TCL 10 5G UW counts with longer battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 30 percent more battery size.
Google Nexus 6P is way more expensive than the TCL 10 5G UW, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.