Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-29 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 has a global score of 81.6, which is much better than TCL 10 5G UW's 73.5 score. Even though Google Pixel 2 is notably older than the TCL 10 5G UW, it's body is a lot lighter and somewhat thinner. Google Pixel 2 counts with a bit more vivid screen than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 1920 resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better display density.
The TCL 10 5G UW has just a little better performance than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the TCL 10 5G UW also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The TCL 10 5G UW shoots much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same video resolution, the same 30 fps video frame rates and a same size camera aperture, the TCL 10 5G UW also has a lot more MP camera.
The TCL 10 5G UW features a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the TCL 10 5G UW also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB. TCL 10 5G UW features a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 2700mAh.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Google Pixel 2 is also a bargain compared to others, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.