Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-29 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel XL has an overall score of 81.3, which is better than the TCL 10 5G UW's 73.5 score. Although the Google Pixel XL is extremely older than the TCL 10 5G UW, it's design is lighter and a bit thinner. TCL 10 5G UW features a bit more powerful processor than Google Pixel XL, because it has more RAM memory and more cpu cores.
The Google Pixel XL counts with a bit more vivid display than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater display density and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. The TCL 10 5G UW features a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the TCL 10 5G UW also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB.
The TCL 10 5G UW captures much clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the TCL 10 5G UW also has a much better resolution camera in the back and a bigger aperture to capture better photos in low light environments.
TCL 10 5G UW has improved battery life than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel XL is a better device, it costs a lot more than TCL 10 5G UW, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as TCL 10 5G UW. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Google Pixel XL, but if you don't you can save some money and get the TCL 10 5G UW, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.