Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-10-29 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Aurora black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is much better than TCL 10 5G UW, getting a global score of 83.7 against 73.5. The LG V50 ThinQ design is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than TCL 10 5G UW, even though it was released a little bit more than a year before. Both devices in this comparison use the same Android 10 operating system.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a slightly better looking screen than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120px resolution and a higher number of pixels per inch of screen. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much greater storage to store more apps and games than TCL 10 5G UW, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG V50 ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a bit better processing power than TCL 10 5G UW. Both have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount. TCL 10 5G UW shoots slightly better videos and photos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has slower video frame rate and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the TCL 10 5G UW also counts with a camera with a lot better 48 megapixels resolution.
TCL 10 5G UW features a bit longer battery duration than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 13 percent larger battery size.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, LG V50 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to the other devices, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.