Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-10-29 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Black and Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo is a little bit better than the TCL 10 5G UW, getting a 77.9 score against 73.5. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola DROID Turbo has a newer 4.4.4 version while TCL 10 5G UW has Android 10 version. Even though the Motorola DROID Turbo is incredibly older and thicker than TCL 10 5G UW, it's construction is still somewhat lighter.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a little better processing power than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster) and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit. Motorola DROID Turbo has a much better looking screen than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a higher display density.
The TCL 10 5G UW shoots much better photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the TCL 10 5G UW also has a larger aperture to take better captures in low-light situations, a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels and faster 30 fps video frame rate.
TCL 10 5G UW has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 256 GB and 128 GB internal storage. The TCL 10 5G UW has a bit superior battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3900mAh.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Motorola DROID Turbo is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.