Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-29 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.11 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 is much better than the TCL 10 5G UW, getting a general score of 81.2 against 73.5. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 50 has the newer 14 version while TCL 10 5G UW has Android 10, counting with some nice extra features and increased performance. Motorola Edge 50 is a noticeably newer device, and it's also somewhat thinner and lighter than the TCL 10 5G UW.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with a more vivid screen than TCL 10 5G UW, because it has a just a bit higher quantity of pixels per inch in the display, a bit bigger screen and a little higher resolution of 1220 x 2712px. Motorola Edge 50 features a bit more memory capacity for apps and games than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
TCL 10 5G UW features a much faster CPU than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 captures just a bit better pictures and videos than TCL 10 5G UW, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a back camera with more MP.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with just a bit longer battery life than TCL 10 5G UW, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.