Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-10-29 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Black and Gold |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.11 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has an overall score of 81, which is much better than TCL 10 5G UW's score of 73.5. Although the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is noticeably older than TCL 10 5G UW, it's design is incredibly thinner and somewhat lighter. Both of these devices have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a more recent 6.0 Marshmallow version while TCL 10 5G UW has Android 10 version.
TCL 10 5G UW features a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processing unit. The TCL 10 5G UW counts with a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen, a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit bigger display.
The TCL 10 5G UW features a very superior camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photography and video, a much better (4K) video definition and a much higher resolution camera. The TCL 10 5G UW counts with a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a SD memory slot that holds up to 256 GB, the TCL 10 5G UW also has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
TCL 10 5G UW has a bit better battery performance than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 13 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.