Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
32 GBSM-N9005
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2020-10-29 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 365.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 has a score of 79.5, which is a little bit better than TCL 10 5G UW's 73.5 overall score. Although Galaxy Note 3 is older than TCL 10 5G UW, it's design is lighter and somewhat thinner. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but Galaxy Note 3 has an older 5.0 version and TCL 10 5G UW has Android 10.
Galaxy Note 3 has a bit better display than TCL 10 5G UW, although it has a quite smaller screen, a bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a just a little lower display density. The TCL 10 5G UW features a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with more processing cores and more RAM memory.
The TCL 10 5G UW counts with a very superior storage to install games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, because it has an external memory card slot that supports up to 256 GB and more internal storage. TCL 10 5G UW has a superior camera than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the TCL 10 5G UW also has a much higher resolution back facing camera and a bigger diafragm aperture.
TCL 10 5G UW has a superior battery performance than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy Note 3 is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper than the TCL 10 5G UW, which makes this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.