Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-29 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note9 has a score of 87.1, which is better than TCL 10 5G UW's 73.5 general score. The Galaxy Note9 design is a bit lighter and just a bit thinner than TCL 10 5G UW, although it was released 2 years before. Galaxy Note9 counts with a little faster processor than TCL 10 5G UW. Both of them have a 6 GB RAM and 8 cores.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a bit sharper display than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater amount of pixels per inch of screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px. Galaxy Note9 counts with a slightly bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than TCL 10 5G UW, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy Note9 also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The TCL 10 5G UW has a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh. TCL 10 5G UW counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy Note9, because although it has slower video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing pictures or videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the TCL 10 5G UW also counts with a camera in the back with way more megapixels.
Galaxy Note9 costs a bit more money than the TCL 10 5G UW, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.