Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-29 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 400.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a general score of 77.8, which is just a bit better than the TCL 10 5G UW's score of 73.5. Both devices in this comparison include Android operating system, but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has newer 14 version and TCL 10 5G UW has Android 10 version, so it gives you a couple nice extra features and performance enhancements. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a notably newer and thinner device than the TCL 10 5G UW, but it's just a bit heavier.
TCL 10 5G UW features a way better hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot better display than TCL 10 5G UW, because it has a much higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels, a bit higher pixels number in each inch of screen and a larger screen.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot bigger memory for apps and games than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a superior camera than TCL 10 5G UW, because it has a much better video definition, a higher 50 MP resolution camera and a bigger camera aperture.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features improved battery performance than TCL 10 5G UW, because it has a 5700mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than TCL 10 5G UW, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as TCL 10 5G UW. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy TCL 10 5G UW, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.