Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-29 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.11 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X60 Pro has an overall score of 78.8, which is a little bit better than the TCL 10 5G UW's 73.5 score. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but vivo X60 Pro has 11 version and TCL 10 5G UW has Android 10, giving some additional features and improved performance. Vivo X60 Pro's body is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than the TCL 10 5G UW, even though both were released with only a couple of months difference.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit better processing unit than TCL 10 5G UW, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Vivo X60 Pro has a bit better screen than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has a little worse pixels quantity per screen inch, it also counts with a little bit bigger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2376px resolution.
Vivo X60 Pro takes a little bit better photographs and videos than TCL 10 5G UW, and although they both have a 48 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the vivo X60 Pro also has better video frame rates. The vivo X60 Pro features a little bit better memory capacity to install applications and games than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB more internal storage.
TCL 10 5G UW features a little longer battery duration than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.