Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-10-29 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 5.73 x 2.77 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 400.00 | $ 345.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 5s has an overall score of 76.4, which is a bit better than TCL 10 5G UW's 73.5 general score. Although the Xiaomi Mi 5s is much older than TCL 10 5G UW, it's body is somewhat thinner and much lighter. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Mi 5s has a more recent 6.0 Marshmallow version while TCL 10 5G UW has Android 10.
The Xiaomi Mi 5s features a little more vivid screen than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has a really smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 1920px resolution, it also counts with a just a little better screen pixels density. TCL 10 5G UW counts with a little better processing power than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has more cores and a greater amount of RAM.
The TCL 10 5G UW has a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 5s, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the TCL 10 5G UW also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB. The TCL 10 5G UW counts with a way better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
TCL 10 5G UW shoots much better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi 5s, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the TCL 10 5G UW also has a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution and a bigger aperture.
Xiaomi Mi 5s not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheap compared to the TCL 10 5G UW, making buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.