Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-29 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Black, Blue and Red |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a global score of 85.5, which is better than TCL 10 5G UW's global score of 73.5. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 construction is somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner than the TCL 10 5G UW, even though it was released 2 years before. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a bit superior processor than TCL 10 5G UW, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a bit more vivid display than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2246 resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little greater screen density. The TCL 10 5G UW counts with just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition, the TCL 10 5G UW also counts with a camera in the back with a much better resolution and a bigger camera aperture.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than TCL 10 5G UW, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 256 GB, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has 256 GB internal storage capacity. TCL 10 5G UW has just a bit longer battery performance than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 costs a bit more than the TCL 10 5G UW, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.