Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-19 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Ember gray | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone XS Max has a score of 84.5, which is much better than the TCL 10 Pro's 72.1 global score. IPhone XS Max's construction is somewhat thinner than TCL 10 Pro, but it's somewhat heavier and was released about 20 months before. The iPhone XS Max has a better CPU than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has 2 GB lesser RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
Apple iPhone XS Max features a screen that's just as good as the TCL 10 Pro one, because although the Apple iPhone XS Max has way less brightness, and they both have a screen with the same size, it also counts with a just a little greater pixels count in each inch of screen and a quite better resolution of 1242 x 2688px.
The TCL 10 Pro features a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than iPhone XS Max, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 256 GB. TCL 10 Pro shoots better pictures and videos than iPhone XS Max, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have a same size aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a lot larger sensor providing a way better image quality and a lot higher resolution back-facing camera.
TCL 10 Pro counts with a really longer battery duration than iPhone XS Max, because it has 4550mAh of battery capacity against 3179mAh.
Although Apple iPhone XS Max is a better device, it costs a lot more than TCL 10 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as TCL 10 Pro. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy TCL 10 Pro, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.