Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-19 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Ember gray | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6P has a score of 80.3, which is better than the TCL 10 Pro's overall score of 72.1. Despite of the fact that the Google Nexus 6P is a lot older than the TCL 10 Pro, it's body is just a bit lighter and somewhat thinner. The TCL 10 Pro counts with a bit better hardware performance than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the TCL 10 Pro also has 3 GB more RAM.
TCL 10 Pro counts with a bit sharper screen than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a bit worse pixel density and a little bit lower 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a little larger display. TCL 10 Pro counts with a greater camera than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video definition, the TCL 10 Pro also has a bigger aperture, a much bigger sensor providing a way better image quality and a much better 64 mega pixels resolution back camera.
TCL 10 Pro features a lot bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the TCL 10 Pro also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 256 GB. TCL 10 Pro counts with improved battery performance than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 4550mAh battery size against 3450mAh.
Google Nexus 6P costs a lot more money than the TCL 10 Pro, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.