Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-19 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Ember gray | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 has an overall score of 81.6, which is better than TCL 10 Pro's 72.1 global score. The Google Pixel 2 is an way older phone than the TCL 10 Pro, but Google was able to make it somewhat thinner and extremely lighter. The TCL 10 Pro counts with a bit better looking display than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a just a little lower count of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a larger display.
Google Pixel 2 counts with a bit better processing power than TCL 10 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. TCL 10 Pro takes way better photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the same camera aperture and the same video frame rates, the TCL 10 Pro also has a back camera with lot more MP and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and pictures.
The TCL 10 Pro features a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the TCL 10 Pro also has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB. TCL 10 Pro features a very superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has 4550mAh of battery capacity against 2700mAh.
Google Pixel 2 is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.