Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-19 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Ember gray | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel XL is better than the TCL 10 Pro, getting a score of 81.3 against 72.1. Even though the Google Pixel XL is notably older than TCL 10 Pro, it's construction is lighter and a little thinner. TCL 10 Pro counts with a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has 4 more processing cores and 2 GB more RAM.
TCL 10 Pro has a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a lot lesser pixels per screen inch and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a bigger screen. TCL 10 Pro has a much bigger memory for apps and games than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the TCL 10 Pro also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 256 GB.
TCL 10 Pro shoots way better videos and photos than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the TCL 10 Pro also has a lot more megapixels camera, a bigger aperture for better low light captures and video and a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking much better quality videos and photos.
TCL 10 Pro features longer battery duration than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 4550mAh battery size.
Although Google Pixel XL is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the TCL 10 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as TCL 10 Pro. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Google Pixel XL, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the TCL 10 Pro, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.