Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-19 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Ember gray | Aurora black |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a general score of 83.7, which is better than TCL 10 Pro's 72.1 score. Even though LG V50 ThinQ is older than the TCL 10 Pro, it's body is just a bit lighter and a little thinner. Both phones in our current comparison include the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding that.
The LG V50 ThinQ features just a little better hardware performance than TCL 10 Pro. They have 6 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. The TCL 10 Pro counts with a slightly better looking display than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has way less pixels per screen inch and a lot worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a very superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The TCL 10 Pro has a better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture and slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a way more megapixels camera in the back and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
TCL 10 Pro has just a bit longer battery lifetime than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 4550mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, LG V50 ThinQ is also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.