Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Ember gray | Black and Blue |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Droid Turbo is a bit better than TCL 10 Pro, with a score of 76.4 against 72.1. The Motorola Droid Turbo is an extremely older and somewhat thicker phone than TCL 10 Pro, but Motorola could make it a little bit lighter anyway. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS, but the Motorola Droid Turbo has a newer 4.4.4 version while TCL 10 Pro has Android 10, so it gives you a couple additional features and increased performance.
Motorola Droid Turbo has just a little better hardware performance than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster) and 3 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. The Motorola Droid Turbo features a bit sharper screen than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a better display pixel density and a higher 2560 x 1440px resolution.
TCL 10 Pro features a very superior camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the TCL 10 Pro also has faster 30 fps video frame rate, a larger aperture to capture better images and videos in low-light situations and a way higher resolution camera.
The TCL 10 Pro features a much bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 96 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB. TCL 10 Pro has a bit better battery life than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 17% greater battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Motorola Droid Turbo is also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.