Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Ember gray | Black and Blue |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo has an overall score of 77.9, which is a bit better than the TCL 10 Pro's general score of 72.1. The Motorola DROID Turbo is a notably older and thicker phone than the TCL 10 Pro, but Motorola made it a bit lighter anyway. These phones include Android operating system, but Motorola DROID Turbo has a more recent 4.4.4 version and TCL 10 Pro has Android 10, offering lots of additional features.
Motorola DROID Turbo has just a little better processing power than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster) and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. The Motorola DROID Turbo features a slightly better looking screen than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a greater pixels number in each inch of display.
TCL 10 Pro counts with a way bigger memory for apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 256 GB. The TCL 10 Pro features a bit superior battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 4550mAh battery size against 3900mAh.
TCL 10 Pro captures much better pictures and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same video definition, the TCL 10 Pro also has a bigger camera aperture to take better images in low-light situations, a way more megapixels back camera and better 30 fps video frame rates.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Motorola DROID Turbo is also by far the cheapest one, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.