Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Ember gray | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 has a general score of 81.2, which is better than the TCL 10 Pro's global score of 72.1. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 has 14 version while TCL 10 Pro has Android 10 version. Motorola Edge 50 is a way newer phone, and it is also somewhat thinner and a little bit lighter than TCL 10 Pro.
The Motorola Edge 50 has a little sharper display than TCL 10 Pro, because it has a bit larger display, a little bit better pixels density, a little higher resolution of 1220 x 2712 and much more brightness. TCL 10 Pro counts with a much better performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The TCL 10 Pro shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor providing a worse image quality, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a camera with a lot better 64 megapixels resolution.
The Motorola Edge 50 has a little bit more storage for apps and games than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Motorola Edge 50 has just a little better battery lifetime than TCL 10 Pro, because it has a 10 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.