Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Ember gray | Mystic indigo |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| $ 400.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G Stylus is better than the TCL 10 Pro, having a general score of 79.7 against 72.1. Motorola Moto G Stylus's construction has the same thickness than the TCL 10 Pro, but it is just a bit heavier. Both devices in this comparison review have Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Moto G Stylus has a newer 11 version while TCL 10 Pro has Android 10, so it provides the user some nice extra features and optimized performance.
The TCL 10 Pro has just a bit better performance than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the TCL 10 Pro also has more RAM memory. The TCL 10 Pro has a sharper display than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a just a little worse display density, it also counts with a quite bigger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution.
TCL 10 Pro takes a bit better pictures and videos than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a back camera with a way higher resolution and a larger back camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photos.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus features just a bit more storage to install applications and games than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has an external SD slot that admits up to 512 GB. The TCL 10 Pro has a bit longer battery lifetime than Moto G Stylus, because it has a 4550mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Moto G Stylus is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.