Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-19 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Ember gray | Gray and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto Z4 has a score of 79.8, which is much better than TCL 10 Pro's 72.1 global score. The Moto Z4 body is somewhat thinner and lighter than TCL 10 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released about a year before. Both of these phones have the same Android 10 operating system. TCL 10 Pro counts with a little better processing power than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the TCL 10 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The TCL 10 Pro has a brighter display than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has a quite worse amount of pixels per screen inch, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a bit bigger display. TCL 10 Pro counts with a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting photos and videos in low light environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a much more megapixels back facing camera and a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing higher quality videos and photographs.
Moto Z4 features a slightly better storage capacity for games and applications than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Moto Z4 also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 512 GB. The TCL 10 Pro features improved battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z4, because it has 4550mAh of battery capacity instead of 3600mAh.
The Moto Z4 costs more than the TCL 10 Pro, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.