Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2021-03-30 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Ember gray | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X3 Pro has an overall score of 79.9, which is better than TCL 10 Pro's 72.1 overall score. OPPO Find X3 Pro is a newer and a little thinner device than the TCL 10 Pro, but it's also just a bit heavier. These devices come with Android OS, but the OPPO Find X3 Pro has newer 11 version while TCL 10 Pro has Android 10 version.
TCL 10 Pro has a little bit better display than OPPO Find X3 Pro, although it has a little worse display density, a quite smaller display and a lot lower resolution of 1080 x 2340. The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a bit more powerful CPU than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a little bit better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. OPPO Find X3 Pro and TCL 10 Pro feature extremely similar cameras, because although the OPPO Find X3 Pro has a worse (4K) video definition and a camera in the back with a lot lower resolution, and they both have a same size aperture, it also counts with a larger camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
The TCL 10 Pro has just a bit longer battery performance than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because it has 4550mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.