Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android |
| 2020-05-19 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Ember gray | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Glass and Metal | Metal and Plastic |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 396 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 has a general score of 84.7, which is much better than TCL 10 Pro's 72.1 global score. The Galaxy A32 is a a little bit heavier phone than the TCL 10 Pro, but they are equally thin. The Galaxy A32 counts with Android OS, while TCL 10 Pro has Android 10 OS. TCL 10 Pro has a little faster processor than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the TCL 10 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The TCL 10 Pro counts with a way better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have a display with the same size, the TCL 10 Pro also has a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a higher pixels density. The TCL 10 Pro features just a bit bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that supports 768 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy A32 has a bit superior battery performance than TCL 10 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4550mAh. TCL 10 Pro takes much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, a F1.8 aperture and the same video resolution, the TCL 10 Pro also has a camera in the back with a way better 64 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.