Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-19 | 2018-10-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Ember gray | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) is much better than TCL 10 Pro, getting an 84.2 score against 72.1. Despite of the fact that Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) is older than TCL 10 Pro, it's design is lighter and somewhat thinner. The Galaxy A7 (2018) features just a little better performance than TCL 10 Pro. Both have a 6 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit.
TCL 10 Pro counts with a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a bit inferior number of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a quite larger display. TCL 10 Pro features a lot better camera than Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for capturing photos and/or video in low light environments, it also counts with a much better video quality, a way bigger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) features a bit bigger memory for games and applications than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The TCL 10 Pro features a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a 4550mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.