Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-05-19 | 2018-08-27 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.39 x 3.03 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Ember gray | Black and White |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Metal |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A8 Star is much better than TCL 10 Pro, with an 82.1 score against 72.1. Samsung Galaxy A8 Star's design is somewhat thinner than the TCL 10 Pro, although it is just a bit heavier and was released just a bit more than a year before. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A8 Star has newer 9.0 Pie version and TCL 10 Pro has Android 10 version, providing you some additional features.
TCL 10 Pro features a more vivid screen than Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a just a little greater screen pixels density, a little bit higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a bit larger screen. TCL 10 Pro has more memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A8 Star, because although it has a SD memory slot that supports 144 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory.
The Galaxy A8 Star has a bit better performance than TCL 10 Pro. Both have 8 CPU cores and the same RAM amount. TCL 10 Pro features superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because it has 4550mAh of battery capacity. TCL 10 Pro captures way better pictures and videos than Galaxy A8 Star, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor and a way higher resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.