Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-19 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Ember gray | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A80 has a global score of 84.9, which is much better than the TCL 10 Pro's overall score of 72.1. Although it's the best phone we are comparing, the Samsung Galaxy A80 design is older, just a little thicker and somewhat heavier than the TCL 10 Pro. The Samsung Galaxy A80 has just a bit better performance than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also has more RAM memory.
The TCL 10 Pro features a better display than Galaxy A80, because although it has a little smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixel count in each inch of display. The TCL 10 Pro captures better pictures and videos than Galaxy A80, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the TCL 10 Pro also has a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back, a larger camera aperture and a larger camera sensor taking higher quality videos and pictures.
TCL 10 Pro counts with a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A80, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the TCL 10 Pro also has a SD card slot that holds up to 256 GB. The TCL 10 Pro has longer battery duration than Galaxy A80, because it has a 23% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.