Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-05-19 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Ember gray | Black and Gold |
| Glass and Metal | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is much better than TCL 10 Pro, getting an 81 score against 72.1. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's body is a lot thinner than TCL 10 Pro, but it's just a little bit heavier and was released 3 years before. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has the newer 6.0 Marshmallow version while TCL 10 Pro has Android 10, so it provides the user some extra features and better performance.
TCL 10 Pro has a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a quite greater amount of pixels per inch of screen, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a quite larger display. TCL 10 Pro features a little better hardware performance than Galaxy C9 Pro. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM memory and 8 cores.
The TCL 10 Pro has a lot bigger memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have an external memory card slot that holds up to 256 GB, the TCL 10 Pro also has 128 GB internal storage. TCL 10 Pro features a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 4550mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
The TCL 10 Pro captures greater videos and photos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a lot more mega pixels back camera, a bigger aperture to take better low light images and a lot higher (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.