Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-19 | 2019-09-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Ember gray | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M30s is much better than TCL 10 Pro, getting a general score of 83.3 against 72.1. Even though Galaxy M30s and the TCL 10 Pro were released with only 8 months difference, the Galaxy M30s construction is a bit thinner but also just a little heavier than the TCL 10 Pro. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy M30s has newer 11 version while TCL 10 Pro has Android 10 version, so it counts with a couple additional features and some performance improvements.
TCL 10 Pro counts with a bit better display than Galaxy M30s, because although it has a just a bit inferior pixel amount per inch in the screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a little bit larger screen. The Galaxy M30s features a bit better processor than TCL 10 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The TCL 10 Pro features a bit better camera than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the TCL 10 Pro also has a way higher 64 MP resolution back-facing camera, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light captures and a larger back camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photographs.
The TCL 10 Pro counts with a better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy M30s, because although it has an external memory slot that supports up to 256 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy M30s has longer battery lifetime than TCL 10 Pro, because it has a 32% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.