Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 86.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2020-03-05 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Ember gray | Black, Blue and Red |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M31 has an overall score of 86.5, which is much better than TCL 10 Pro's overall score of 72.1. Even though the Samsung Galaxy M31 and TCL 10 Pro were released only 2 months apart, Samsung Galaxy M31's body is just a little bit heavier but also just a little thinner. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy M31 has a more recent 11 version and TCL 10 Pro has Android 10 version.
The Galaxy M31 counts with a little better hardware performance than TCL 10 Pro. Both of them have 8 CPU cores and 6 GB of RAM memory. The TCL 10 Pro has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy M31, because although it has a little worse pixel density, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a little larger display and way more brightness.
TCL 10 Pro features a bigger storage to install applications and games than Galaxy M31, because although it has a SD memory slot that holds 256 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy M31 has greater battery performance than TCL 10 Pro, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
The Galaxy M31 features a camera that's just as good as the camera in TCL 10 Pro, they have a 0.59 inches sensor, a same resolution camera, a same size aperture, the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.