Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-19 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Ember gray | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a general score of 87.1, which is much better than the TCL 10 Pro's general score of 72.1. Samsung Galaxy Note9's body is just a little thinner than TCL 10 Pro, but it is a little heavier and was released around 21 months before. The Galaxy Note9 features a little bit better performance than TCL 10 Pro. They have 8 cpu cores and 6 GB of RAM memory.
The TCL 10 Pro features a bit better looking screen than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a just a little less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a slightly better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB.
TCL 10 Pro has a little longer battery performance than Galaxy Note9, because it has a 4550mAh battery size. The TCL 10 Pro counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has lower video frame rates and a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a back camera with way more megapixels and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photographs.
Samsung Galaxy Note9 costs a bit more money than the TCL 10 Pro, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.