Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Ember gray | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass and Metal | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 6.4 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S6 edge+ is better than TCL 10 Pro, getting a 79.3 score against 72.1. Galaxy S6 edge+ is an noticeably older cellphone than TCL 10 Pro, but it is lighter and thinner anyway. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S6 edge+ has the previous 5.1 version while TCL 10 Pro has Android 10 version.
Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a slightly better screen than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution. The TCL 10 Pro counts with a little faster processor than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has more processing cores (although slower) and a larger amount of RAM memory.
The TCL 10 Pro counts with a way better camera than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the TCL 10 Pro also has a lot bigger sensor providing a way higher image quality, a bigger aperture and a lot better resolution back-facing camera.
The TCL 10 Pro has a much greater storage to install applications and games than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD memory slot that admits up to 256 GB. The TCL 10 Pro features a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 4550mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S6 edge+ costs a little more money than the TCL 10 Pro, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.