Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Ember gray | Black and White |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| $ 400.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is just a bit better than the TCL 10 Pro, having a 77.8 score against 72.1. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro design is extremely newer and a lot thinner, but also heavier than TCL 10 Pro. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has 14 version while TCL 10 Pro has Android 10.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a more vivid display than TCL 10 Pro, because it has a bigger display, a way higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px, a little bit more pixels per inch of screen and much more brightness. TCL 10 Pro counts with a much better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a bit better camera than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has a back camera with a much lower resolution, it also counts with a lot better video definition, a way bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a larger aperture to take better photos in low light environments.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with longer battery life than TCL 10 Pro, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the TCL 10 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the TCL 10 Pro. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the TCL 10 Pro, letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.