Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Ember gray | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Glass and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The vivo X60 Pro is just a bit better than the TCL 10 Pro, with a 78.8 score against 72.1. Vivo X60 Pro's body is newer, thinner and just a little bit lighter than TCL 10 Pro. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but the vivo X60 Pro has the newer 11 version and TCL 10 Pro has Android 10 version.
TCL 10 Pro counts with just a bit better screen than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a bit better screen density. Vivo X60 Pro has a slightly bigger memory capacity for apps and games than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with just a little better hardware performance than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X60 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM memory. TCL 10 Pro features a bit better camera than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and a same size aperture, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking better quality videos and photos and a back camera with much more megapixels.
The TCL 10 Pro counts with just a bit longer battery lifetime than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 4550mAh battery size instead of 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.