Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-19 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Ember gray | Black, Blue and Red |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is better than TCL 10 Pro, having an 85.5 score against 72.1. Despite of the fact that the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is older than TCL 10 Pro, it's design is just a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a bit more powerful processor than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has more RAM memory.
TCL 10 Pro features a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a just a bit worse pixel number per display inch, it also counts with a way brighter screen, a little larger screen and a little bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a superior memory for games and applications than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 256 GB, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has 256 GB internal memory.
The TCL 10 Pro counts with a bit longer battery duration than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 4550mAh battery capacity. The TCL 10 Pro features a much better camera than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with a way better 64 mega pixels resolution, a larger diafragm aperture and a much bigger sensor.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a bit more expensive than TCL 10 Pro, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.