Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-07 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.54 x 3.02 x 0.36 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Mist Gray and Placid Blue | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 1080 x 2400 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 is better than the TCL 20 5G, getting an 81.6 score against 73.1. Despite of the fact that Google Pixel 2 is incredibly older than the TCL 20 5G, it's design is somewhat thinner and noticeably lighter. TCL 20 5G has just a bit better screen than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a little bit lower pixels amount in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a lot larger display and a quite better resolution of 2400 x 1080 pixels.
The TCL 20 5G counts with a lot bigger memory for apps and games than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the TCL 20 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 256 GB. Google Pixel 2 features a bit better CPU than TCL 20 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
TCL 20 5G counts with a way better battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. TCL 20 5G features a better camera than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the TCL 20 5G also has a lot bigger sensor capturing much higher quality photographs and a lot better resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.