Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-12-07 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.54 x 3.02 x 0.36 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Mist Gray and Placid Blue | Black and Gold |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 2400 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.33 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a global score of 81, which is better than the TCL 20 5G's overall score of 73.1. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has the newer 6.0 Marshmallow version and TCL 20 5G has Android 10 version, so it gives you some nice extra features and performance improvements. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro design is a bit lighter and thinner than TCL 20 5G, even though it was released 4 years before.
The TCL 20 5G features a bit better processor than Galaxy C9 Pro. They have the same RAM memory amount and 8 CPU cores. TCL 20 5G has a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little higher 2400 x 1080 resolution, a just a bit greater display density and a quite larger screen.
TCL 20 5G takes a lot better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a much better (4K) video definition, a much higher 48 megapixels resolution back camera and a bigger camera aperture. TCL 20 5G counts with a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have an external SD slot that supports up to 256 GB, the TCL 20 5G also has 128 GB internal memory.
The TCL 20 5G features a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.