Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-07 | 2017-09-19 |
| 6.54 x 3.02 x 0.36 inches | 5.83 x 2.87 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Mist Gray and Placid Blue | Black, Blue, Pink and Silver |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1080 x 2400 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xperia XZ1 has a score of 78.3, which is just a bit better than the TCL 20 5G's score of 73.1. The Xperia XZ1 construction is somewhat thinner and a lot lighter than the TCL 20 5G, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. TCL 20 5G counts with a slightly better looking display than Xperia XZ1, because although it has a little less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 2400 x 1080px and a larger display.
Xperia XZ1 has a bit more powerful processing unit than TCL 20 5G, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Xperia XZ1 counts with a greater memory capacity to install games and applications than TCL 20 5G, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB.
TCL 20 5G takes slightly better photographs and videos than Xperia XZ1, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the TCL 20 5G also has a larger aperture, a bigger sensor taking better quality videos and photos and a much higher resolution camera in the back.
The TCL 20 5G counts with a superior battery life than Sony Xperia XZ1, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.