Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-12-07 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.54 x 3.02 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Mist Gray and Placid Blue | Black and White |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 1080 x 2400 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is just a bit better than the TCL 20 5G, getting a 77.8 score against 73.1. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android operating system, but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has newer 14 version while TCL 20 5G has Android 10. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro body is a lot newer and a lot thinner than the TCL 20 5G's, although it is just a bit heavier.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with an incredibly better looking screen than TCL 20 5G, because it has a little better pixels count per inch in the display, a larger screen, a much better resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels and a much brighter display. TCL 20 5G has a much more powerful processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 10 GB less RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much greater memory to install games and applications than TCL 20 5G, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes much better photos and videos than TCL 20 5G, because it has a way higher video resolution, a larger aperture for better captures in low light environments, a back facing camera with more megapixels and a lot bigger sensor.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with longer battery life than TCL 20 5G, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.