Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-20 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Marine Blue and Moondust Gray | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.62 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6P is just a bit better than TCL 20 Pro 5G, getting a overall score of 80.3 against 76.1. The Google Nexus 6P construction is a little lighter and thinner than the TCL 20 Pro 5G, although it was released 6 years before. Google Nexus 6P has a little more vivid display than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher count of pixels per inch of screen.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G has a bit faster processing unit than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same number of cores, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has 3 GB more RAM. TCL 20 Pro 5G features a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB and 256 GB internal storage.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with longer battery duration than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 30% bigger battery size. TCL 20 Pro 5G shoots much clearer videos and photos than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has a way more mega pixels camera in the back, a bigger camera sensor taking better quality videos and pictures and a larger aperture for better low-light images and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.