Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-20 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Marine Blue and Moondust Gray | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.62 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is a bit better than TCL 20 Pro 5G, getting an 81.6 score against 76.1. Although the Google Pixel 2 is notably older than TCL 20 Pro 5G, it's design is notably lighter and somewhat thinner. The Google Pixel 2 counts with a little bit better looking display than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 1920 resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better pixel density.
The Google Pixel 2 has a bit superior CPU than TCL 20 Pro 5G, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. TCL 20 Pro 5G shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same diafragm aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera and a much bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because it has 256 GB internal memory and a SD card slot that supports up to 1 TB. TCL 20 Pro 5G has a much better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 67% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.