Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-20 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Marine Blue and Moondust Gray | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.62 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel XL has a score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than the TCL 20 Pro 5G's global score of 76.1. Google Pixel XL's body is lighter and a little bit thinner than TCL 20 Pro 5G, although it was released 5 years before. The Google Pixel XL has a little sharper display than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a better number of pixels per inch of display.
TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a much bigger memory for applications and games than Google Pixel XL, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and more internal storage capacity. The TCL 20 Pro 5G has a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory and more cores.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G shoots much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has a back facing camera with way more megapixels, a bigger aperture and a larger sensor capturing better quality videos and photos.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G features longer battery life than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 30% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.