Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-04-20 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Marine Blue and Moondust Gray | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.62 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 has a global score of 81.2, which is just a bit better than TCL 20 Pro 5G's 76.1 overall score. The Motorola Edge 50 is a much newer phone, and it is also somewhat thinner and a little lighter than the TCL 20 Pro 5G. Both devices in this review come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 has a newer 14 version while TCL 20 Pro 5G has Android 11 version, offering some nice extra features.
Motorola Edge 50 has a brighter display than TCL 20 Pro 5G, and although they both have a same size screen, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a quite better 1220 x 2712 resolution and a quite better amount of pixels in each inch in the display. The TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Motorola Edge 50 features just a bit better camera than TCL 20 Pro 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and pictures and a higher 50 megapixels resolution camera.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G has a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has an external memory card slot that supports up to 1 TB. Motorola Edge 50 features just a little better battery duration than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.