Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-04-20 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Marine Blue and Moondust Gray | Black and Gold |
| Glass | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro has an overall score of 81, which is slightly better than TCL 20 Pro 5G's global score of 76.1. The Galaxy C9 Pro design is just a bit lighter and extremely thinner than TCL 20 Pro 5G, although it was released many years before. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS, but Galaxy C9 Pro has the newer 6.0 Marshmallow version while TCL 20 Pro 5G has Android 11, counting with a couple nice extra features.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a bit bigger screen and a little bit greater number of pixels in each inch of display. TCL 20 Pro 5G has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy C9 Pro. Both have the same RAM amount and 8 CPU cores.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G has a way bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 192 GB more internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that admits up to 1 TB. TCL 20 Pro 5G takes much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a much higher 48 megapixels resolution back camera, a lot higher video quality and a larger diafragm aperture.
TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a little longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 13 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.