Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-04-20 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Marine Blue and Moondust Gray | Black and White |
| Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.62 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a general score of 77.8, which is just a bit better than the TCL 20 Pro 5G's 76.1 global score. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro body is notably newer and notably thinner than the TCL 20 Pro 5G's, although it is heavier. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has the newer 14 version while TCL 20 Pro 5G has Android 11 version.
TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with an extremely better processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much more vibrant screen than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because it has a lot higher resolution of 2200 x 2480, a larger screen and a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures much better videos and photos than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because it has a bigger camera aperture, a more mega pixels back camera, a much bigger back camera sensor which provides a much higher image and video quality and a way better 7680x4320 video definition. The TCL 20 Pro 5G has a slightly bigger storage to install applications and games than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1 TB.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features longer battery life than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because it has a 27% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.