Search


Compare phones

Global Score
34.145.6
Basic Information
UMXZTE
Android 4.1Android 2.3.5
--2011-10-20
4.80 x 2.52 x 0.53 inches5.10 x 2.70 x 0.45 inches
4.23 ounces4.93 ounces
--Scratch-Resistant Glass
$ 75.00$ 75.00
Display / Screen
4 inches4.3 inches
--480 x 800 pixels
--TFT
233 pixels per inch217 pixels per inch
Capacitive, Multi-touchCapacitive, Multi-touch
6.67
Performance
--Qualcomm Snapdragon S2 MSM8655 chipset
processor Single-Core 1000 MHz processor
--512 MB RAM
Yes GPUYes GPU
5.767.38
Storage
--4 GB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
02.5
Camera
5.00 MP5.00 MP
5.55.5
Networks
Wi-FiWi-Fi
Mobile Hotspot--
CDMAEV-DO A and CDMA
3.12.6
Battery Life
800mAh Li-Ion Battery1600mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
252 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
270 hours standby time
7.5 hours talk time
2.243.44
Other Features
BluetoothBluetooth 2.1
GPSGPS
Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity SensorAccelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor

Comparison review

ZTE Warp is way better than UMX U680, having a score of 45.6 against 34.1. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but the ZTE Warp has 2.3.5 version while UMX U680 has Android 4.1 version. ZTE Warp is a somewhat thinner but heavier phone than the UMX U680. ZTE Warp features a bit better screen than UMX U680, because although it has a just a bit lower pixel number per display inch, it also counts with a quite bigger display.

The ZTE Warp counts with a much powerful processing unit than UMX U680, because it has a greater number of cores. The ZTE Warp's camera is very similar to the camera in UMX U680, both have a same resolution back facing camera. ZTE Warp has a superior memory to store more apps and games than UMX U680.

The ZTE Warp has a much longer battery duration than UMX U680, because it has 1600mAh of battery capacity against 800mAh.

ZTE Warp costs exactly the same than UMX U680.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.