Compare phones
Motorola DROID Turbo
32 GB Metalized Fiber| Global Score | |
| 46.8 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Videocon | Motorola |
| Android 4.1 | Android 4.4.4 |
| -- | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.96 x 3.04 x 0.40 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.42 inches |
| -- | 5.96 ounces |
| Black and White | Gray and Red |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 208 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1200 MHz processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 7.83 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 3.82 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.49 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 2.9 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1800mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 3.68 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo is way better than Videocon A53, with a 76.4 score against 46.8. Both phones in our current comparison use Android operating system, but Motorola DROID Turbo has the newer 4.4.4 version while Videocon A53 has Android 4.1 version. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a much better looking display than Videocon A53, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a way greater number of pixels per inch of screen and a lot higher 2560 x 1440 resolution.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Videocon A53, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage. Motorola DROID Turbo has a much better hardware performance than Videocon A53, because it has more RAM, a GPU and 2 more cpu cores.
Motorola DROID Turbo features a greater camera than Videocon A53, because it has a back facing camera with a way higher 20.7 MP resolution. Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a much better battery performance than Videocon A53, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola DROID Turbo costs a bit more than the Videocon A53, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.