Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3G OnlySM-N9000
| Global Score | |
| 46.6 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Videocon | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| 5.64 x 2.88 x 0.37 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 5.93 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 196 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset |
| Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.1 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.05 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 2.9 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time |
| 3.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 has a score of 80.7, which is way better than the Videocon Infinium Z50Q Star's 46.6 general score. Both devices we compare here have Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note 3 has newer 5.0 version while Videocon Infinium Z50Q Star has Android 4.4.2 version. Galaxy Note 3 counts with a quite better processing power than Videocon Infinium Z50Q Star, because it has a higher number of cores (and also faster), more RAM memory and an additional GPU.
Galaxy Note 3 features a lot better display than Videocon Infinium Z50Q Star, because it has a lot more pixels per inch of screen, a way higher 1920 x 1080 resolution and a bit bigger display. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a way better camera than Videocon Infinium Z50Q Star, because it has a back facing camera with lot more megapixels.
Galaxy Note 3 counts with a much better memory for apps and games than Videocon Infinium Z50Q Star, because it has 64 GB internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 64 GB. Galaxy Note 3 has a much longer battery life than Videocon Infinium Z50Q Star, because it has a 3200mAh battery capacity against 2000mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is also cheaper than the Videocon Infinium Z50Q Star, which makes this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.