Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 40 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Viewsonic | Samsung |
| Android 2.2 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-09-18 |
| 4.49 x 2.40 x 0.49 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 4.41 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| -- | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 1950.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 165 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7227 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Single-Core 600 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.84 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 1.32 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.5 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1400mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.12 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a global score of 94.6, which is much better than ViewSonic V350's 40 overall score. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a more recent 11 version while ViewSonic V350 has Android 2.2, so it provides you some extra features and optimized performance. Galaxy Z Fold 2's design is extremely heavier but extremely thinner than ViewSonic V350.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a lot better looking display than ViewSonic V350, because it has a lot larger screen, a much higher 1768 x 2208 resolution and a much greater pixels number per inch of display. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much faster processor than ViewSonic V350, because it has 7 more CPU cores and a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than ViewSonic V350, although it has no slot for an external memory card. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a very superior camera than ViewSonic V350, because it has a back camera with a much higher resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a much longer battery life than ViewSonic V350, because it has a 221% larger battery capacity.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.